https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293582 The Tribunal dismissed the application as the Petitioner did not qualify as an Operational Creditor under Section 3(23) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and the decree did not meet the criteria for an Operational Debt. Furthermore, the demand notice was deemed invalidly delivered. Consequently, the application was rejected, and both parties were informed accordingly. en-us Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Feb 2021 20:02:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293582 The Tribunal dismissed the application as the Petitioner did not qualify as an Operational Creditor under Section 3(23) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and the decree did not meet the criteria for an Operational Debt. Furthermore, the demand notice was deemed invalidly delivered. Consequently, the application was rejected, and both parties were informed accordingly. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293582