<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1493 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293574</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the case sent back to the original authority for a comprehensive reevaluation. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper verification of facts and documents regarding liability for service tax on reimbursed amounts and compliance with relevant circulars and notifications. The decision aimed to address contradictions and ensure a thorough fact-finding process before reaching a final determination on the issues raised in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 20:02:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1493 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293574</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by way of remand, with the case sent back to the original authority for a comprehensive reevaluation. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper verification of facts and documents regarding liability for service tax on reimbursed amounts and compliance with relevant circulars and notifications. The decision aimed to address contradictions and ensure a thorough fact-finding process before reaching a final determination on the issues raised in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>