<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1583 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293579</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the appellant&#039;s challenge regarding the classification of income from leased properties as business income, citing previous rulings and lack of substantial legal question. However, the HC admitted the issue of interest deduction on share application money as a substantial legal question, directing further proceedings by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1583 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293579</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the appellant&#039;s challenge regarding the classification of income from leased properties as business income, citing previous rulings and lack of substantial legal question. However, the HC admitted the issue of interest deduction on share application money as a substantial legal question, directing further proceedings by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>