<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1303 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293578</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the order denying the refund of Service Tax for a cancelled property booking due to a discrepancy in the Chartered Accountant Certificate. The matter was remanded for a fresh review by the Original Adjudicating Authority, emphasizing procedural fairness and the requirement for issues to be properly raised and addressed during adjudication. The limitation issue, not previously raised, could not be considered in the remand proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 20:02:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1303 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293578</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the order denying the refund of Service Tax for a cancelled property booking due to a discrepancy in the Chartered Accountant Certificate. The matter was remanded for a fresh review by the Original Adjudicating Authority, emphasizing procedural fairness and the requirement for issues to be properly raised and addressed during adjudication. The limitation issue, not previously raised, could not be considered in the remand proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>