<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1235 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293564</link>
    <description>Detained goods were ordered to be released after payment of the demanded tax, with any tax already paid to be deducted. The writ petition was disposed of on the basis that release would follow payment, while the adjudication proceedings were to be completed expeditiously and the final liability determined thereafter. The operative effect was conditional release of the goods, subject to the outcome of the pending adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:28:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1235 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293564</link>
      <description>Detained goods were ordered to be released after payment of the demanded tax, with any tax already paid to be deducted. The writ petition was disposed of on the basis that release would follow payment, while the adjudication proceedings were to be completed expeditiously and the final liability determined thereafter. The operative effect was conditional release of the goods, subject to the outcome of the pending adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>