https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293563 The High Court considered issues regarding the interpretation of Notification No. 26/2005-Service Tax for allowing a party's head office to issue documents for transferring credit to its manufacturing unit, the eligibility of a manufacturer to claim Cenvat credit using non-prescribed documents under Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and the permissibility of claiming Cenvat credit based on documents lacking statutory information as per Rule 4A(2) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The Court directed a hearing for the respondent and stayed proceedings pending further notice following an order of remand by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. en-us Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:36:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293563 The High Court considered issues regarding the interpretation of Notification No. 26/2005-Service Tax for allowing a party's head office to issue documents for transferring credit to its manufacturing unit, the eligibility of a manufacturer to claim Cenvat credit using non-prescribed documents under Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and the permissibility of claiming Cenvat credit based on documents lacking statutory information as per Rule 4A(2) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The Court directed a hearing for the respondent and stayed proceedings pending further notice following an order of remand by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293563