https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404202 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir addressed a dispute over a discrepancy in GST rates charged on a work contract. The petitioner paid GST at 12% based on a notification, while the respondents demanded 18%, leading to a significant tax difference. The core issue involved interpreting tax liability under the Central Goods and Services Taxes Act, focusing on when tax liability arises. The court directed both parties to submit affidavits clarifying the inclusion of GST rates in the tender. Pending resolution, no coercive measures were permitted against the petitioner for the additional tax amount. Further proceedings are pending for a comprehensive examination before a final decision on the disputed tax liability. en-us Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404202 The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir addressed a dispute over a discrepancy in GST rates charged on a work contract. The petitioner paid GST at 12% based on a notification, while the respondents demanded 18%, leading to a significant tax difference. The core issue involved interpreting tax liability under the Central Goods and Services Taxes Act, focusing on when tax liability arises. The court directed both parties to submit affidavits clarifying the inclusion of GST rates in the tender. Pending resolution, no coercive measures were permitted against the petitioner for the additional tax amount. Further proceedings are pending for a comprehensive examination before a final decision on the disputed tax liability. Case-Laws GST Fri, 05 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404202