<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 681 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404189</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2009-10. The court ruled against the revenue on both substantial questions of law, affirming the assessee&#039;s eligibility for claiming depreciation on assets purchased through income application and for carrying forward deficits to subsequent years for set off with future year income. The decision was based on precedents and reasoning from previous judgments referenced during the hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 04:26:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 681 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404189</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2009-10. The court ruled against the revenue on both substantial questions of law, affirming the assessee&#039;s eligibility for claiming depreciation on assets purchased through income application and for carrying forward deficits to subsequent years for set off with future year income. The decision was based on precedents and reasoning from previous judgments referenced during the hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>