<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 669 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404177</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, ruling that the addition of Rs. 2,18,000 lacked legality as it was not supported by the reasons for reassessment. The Tribunal emphasized that if no addition is made based on the grounds mentioned in the reassessment, the reassessment itself becomes invalid. Therefore, the Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 2,18,000 made by the Assessing Officer under sections 143(3) and 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 04:18:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 669 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404177</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, ruling that the addition of Rs. 2,18,000 lacked legality as it was not supported by the reasons for reassessment. The Tribunal emphasized that if no addition is made based on the grounds mentioned in the reassessment, the reassessment itself becomes invalid. Therefore, the Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 2,18,000 made by the Assessing Officer under sections 143(3) and 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>