<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 668 - ITAT PANTNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404176</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty order imposed under section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, finding that the penalty did not meet the legal and procedural requirements. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was deemed bad in law. The judgment emphasizes the significance of complying with specific definitions and procedural safeguards in penalty proceedings under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2021 10:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 668 - ITAT PANTNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404176</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the penalty order imposed under section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act, finding that the penalty did not meet the legal and procedural requirements. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was deemed bad in law. The judgment emphasizes the significance of complying with specific definitions and procedural safeguards in penalty proceedings under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>