https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404166 The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus for the return of seized gold, citing the finality of the Division Bench's previous order. The petitioner's request for immediate return was denied as the earlier direction for adjudication within six months was still pending. The Court upheld the decision, emphasizing adherence to final judgments and rejecting the petitioner's claims of misconduct. The legal distinction between provisional release and absolute return was deemed immaterial, leading to the dismissal of the current plea without costs awarded. en-us Fri, 22 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:19:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404166 The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus for the return of seized gold, citing the finality of the Division Bench's previous order. The petitioner's request for immediate return was denied as the earlier direction for adjudication within six months was still pending. The Court upheld the decision, emphasizing adherence to final judgments and rejecting the petitioner's claims of misconduct. The legal distinction between provisional release and absolute return was deemed immaterial, leading to the dismissal of the current plea without costs awarded. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 22 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404166