https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404165 Non-release of goods did not amount to contempt because the earlier order contained no direction requiring release. The court examined the prior order and held that, without a specific mandate to release the goods, the alleged failure could not amount to disobedience of that order. If the goods were to be released, the proper remedy lay in separate proceedings for that relief, not in contempt. No case was therefore made out for initiation of contempt proceedings. en-us Fri, 08 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:19:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404165 Non-release of goods did not amount to contempt because the earlier order contained no direction requiring release. The court examined the prior order and held that, without a specific mandate to release the goods, the alleged failure could not amount to disobedience of that order. If the goods were to be released, the proper remedy lay in separate proceedings for that relief, not in contempt. No case was therefore made out for initiation of contempt proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 08 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404165