<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1206 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293541</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties under sections 271(1)(c), 50C, and 14A. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, referencing the Hon&#039;ble Calcutta HC&#039;s judgment that penalties are unjustified without evidence of actual receipts beyond declared sale proceeds. The argument of inadvertent error was accepted, and the penalty related to long-term capital gain was deemed disproportionate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1206 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293541</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete penalties under sections 271(1)(c), 50C, and 14A. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, referencing the Hon&#039;ble Calcutta HC&#039;s judgment that penalties are unjustified without evidence of actual receipts beyond declared sale proceeds. The argument of inadvertent error was accepted, and the penalty related to long-term capital gain was deemed disproportionate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>