https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24663 The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioner had an alternative remedy through reference under section 256(1) to the Tribunal. The court declined to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction under article 226 of the Constitution, emphasizing that the petitioner had availed of the remedy of reference against the orders passed under sections 254(1) and 254(2). en-us Mon, 11 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:41:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24663 The court dismissed the writ petition, stating that the petitioner had an alternative remedy through reference under section 256(1) to the Tribunal. The court declined to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction under article 226 of the Constitution, emphasizing that the petitioner had availed of the remedy of reference against the orders passed under sections 254(1) and 254(2). Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 11 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24663