<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1445 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293550</link>
    <description>The Tribunal recalled the order related to the allowability of prior period expenses in ITA appeals due to failure to properly consider the propositions and case laws cited by the assessee, including overlooking important judicial precedents and not giving due regard to the decision of the Jurisdictional High Court. The Tribunal found a mistake apparent on the face of the record and decided to reconsider the relevant grounds afresh, specifically focusing on the allowability of prior period expenses in the ITA appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:13:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1445 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293550</link>
      <description>The Tribunal recalled the order related to the allowability of prior period expenses in ITA appeals due to failure to properly consider the propositions and case laws cited by the assessee, including overlooking important judicial precedents and not giving due regard to the decision of the Jurisdictional High Court. The Tribunal found a mistake apparent on the face of the record and decided to reconsider the relevant grounds afresh, specifically focusing on the allowability of prior period expenses in the ITA appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>