<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (5) TMI 1851 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, UTTAR PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293556</link>
    <description>The application for Advance Ruling under GST by M/s. Awas Bandhu was rejected due to non-compliance with fee payment requirements. Despite being given the opportunity to rectify the deficiency, the applicant failed to pay the required fees to both SGST and CGST as mandated by Section 97(1) read with Rule 104 of the CGST/SGST Act. The decision underscores the significance of adhering to the prescribed payment structure for SGST and CGST, emphasizing that failure to do so can lead to rejection of the application. The ruling serves as a reminder for applicants to ensure full compliance with statutory provisions to avoid such outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2025 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (5) TMI 1851 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, UTTAR PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293556</link>
      <description>The application for Advance Ruling under GST by M/s. Awas Bandhu was rejected due to non-compliance with fee payment requirements. Despite being given the opportunity to rectify the deficiency, the applicant failed to pay the required fees to both SGST and CGST as mandated by Section 97(1) read with Rule 104 of the CGST/SGST Act. The decision underscores the significance of adhering to the prescribed payment structure for SGST and CGST, emphasizing that failure to do so can lead to rejection of the application. The ruling serves as a reminder for applicants to ensure full compliance with statutory provisions to avoid such outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>