<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 1830 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, UTTAR PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293553</link>
    <description>The Authority determined that the applicant&#039;s query regarding dispatching Eucalyptus/Poplar wood through Delivery Challan and issuing the tax invoice post-delivery did not fall within the specified categories for seeking an advance ruling under the GST Act. As a result, the application was deemed &quot;not admitted&quot; as it was beyond the Authority&#039;s jurisdiction as per the provisions of the CGST Act, 2017 and SGST Act, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 1830 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, UTTAR PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293553</link>
      <description>The Authority determined that the applicant&#039;s query regarding dispatching Eucalyptus/Poplar wood through Delivery Challan and issuing the tax invoice post-delivery did not fall within the specified categories for seeking an advance ruling under the GST Act. As a result, the application was deemed &quot;not admitted&quot; as it was beyond the Authority&#039;s jurisdiction as per the provisions of the CGST Act, 2017 and SGST Act, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>