<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 871 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293540</link>
    <description>Where a statute provides an efficacious alternate remedy, the High Court will ordinarily not entertain a writ petition challenging an assessment order. The dispute whether the transaction was taxable under the Bihar Finance Act or the Central Sales Tax Act involved factual and jurisdictional questions that could be examined by the assessing authority and, if needed, in appeal. The availability of an appeal under section 45 of the Bihar Finance Act was a jurisdictional objection that could be raised even at the writ stage. The writ petition was therefore held not maintainable, and the petitioner was relegated to the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 16:10:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 871 - HIGH COURT OF PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293540</link>
      <description>Where a statute provides an efficacious alternate remedy, the High Court will ordinarily not entertain a writ petition challenging an assessment order. The dispute whether the transaction was taxable under the Bihar Finance Act or the Central Sales Tax Act involved factual and jurisdictional questions that could be examined by the assessing authority and, if needed, in appeal. The availability of an appeal under section 45 of the Bihar Finance Act was a jurisdictional objection that could be raised even at the writ stage. The writ petition was therefore held not maintainable, and the petitioner was relegated to the statutory appellate remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>