<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 628 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404136</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking direction for CBITC to respond to the petitioner&#039;s representation, stating CBITC is not obligated to provide legal opinions. The Sales Tax Officer was directed to decide on the petitioner&#039;s application for revocation of registration cancellation within four weeks under Section 30 of the CGST Act. The court disposed of the petition, instructing timely consideration of the application by the Sales Tax Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 13:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 628 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404136</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition seeking direction for CBITC to respond to the petitioner&#039;s representation, stating CBITC is not obligated to provide legal opinions. The Sales Tax Officer was directed to decide on the petitioner&#039;s application for revocation of registration cancellation within four weeks under Section 30 of the CGST Act. The court disposed of the petition, instructing timely consideration of the application by the Sales Tax Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>