https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293526 A compromise recorded in execution governed limitation by the default in the stipulated instalment payments, so the execution petition was within time. The decree was not treated as fully satisfied, because the compromise and earlier disposal order regulated the mode of payment rather than extinguishing the decree, and the decree-holder was entitled to appropriate payments under the governing legal rule. Recovery was confined to the balance strictly due under the decree after proper appropriation of amounts already paid, and further execution could proceed only on a revised statement of account limited to the decretal liability. en-us Fri, 08 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:18:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293526 A compromise recorded in execution governed limitation by the default in the stipulated instalment payments, so the execution petition was within time. The decree was not treated as fully satisfied, because the compromise and earlier disposal order regulated the mode of payment rather than extinguishing the decree, and the decree-holder was entitled to appropriate payments under the governing legal rule. Recovery was confined to the balance strictly due under the decree after proper appropriation of amounts already paid, and further execution could proceed only on a revised statement of account limited to the decretal liability. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293526