<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 1120 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293522</link>
    <description>The High Court partly allowed the appeal, granting relief for specific amounts related to Chennai and Thanjavur and subject to verification for Jaipur. The unexplained entries were otherwise rightly treated as unexplained income of the assessee, and the Department was permitted to assess individuals like Pannalal based on verified records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 16:47:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 1120 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293522</link>
      <description>The High Court partly allowed the appeal, granting relief for specific amounts related to Chennai and Thanjavur and subject to verification for Jaipur. The unexplained entries were otherwise rightly treated as unexplained income of the assessee, and the Department was permitted to assess individuals like Pannalal based on verified records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>