<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 414 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293521</link>
    <description>Industrial units causing serious pollution cannot be allowed to remain at existing sites when evidence shows that effective effluent control there is not feasible; on that basis, the tanneries were required to relocate to the new leather complex. The objection that the proposed complex lay in a wetland was rejected because official survey material showed it was outside the wetland boundary. Applying the precautionary principle and the polluter pays principle, the polluters were made liable for environmental compensation, restoration measures and related fines, while directions were also issued to protect workers through continuity of employment and relocation-related benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 414 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293521</link>
      <description>Industrial units causing serious pollution cannot be allowed to remain at existing sites when evidence shows that effective effluent control there is not feasible; on that basis, the tanneries were required to relocate to the new leather complex. The objection that the proposed complex lay in a wetland was rejected because official survey material showed it was outside the wetland boundary. Applying the precautionary principle and the polluter pays principle, the polluters were made liable for environmental compensation, restoration measures and related fines, while directions were also issued to protect workers through continuity of employment and relocation-related benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>