<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 573 - ITAT AHMDEABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404081</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed both appeals filed by the revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to allow the bad debt claims related to bill discounting and inter-corporate deposits. The ITAT found that the assessee had satisfied the conditions under Section 36(2)(i) by offering the relevant incomes as business income in preceding years, and the claims were consistent with the assessee&#039;s business activities as outlined in its Memorandum of Association.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 13:54:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 573 - ITAT AHMDEABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404081</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed both appeals filed by the revenue, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to allow the bad debt claims related to bill discounting and inter-corporate deposits. The ITAT found that the assessee had satisfied the conditions under Section 36(2)(i) by offering the relevant incomes as business income in preceding years, and the claims were consistent with the assessee&#039;s business activities as outlined in its Memorandum of Association.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>