<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 967 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293518</link>
    <description>An early hearing application in a customs matter was allowed because the goods were a live consignment, warranting expedited disposal of the pending appeal. The application was granted after the other side raised no objection, and the appeal was accordingly listed for hearing on the specified date. The order is procedural and does not decide the substantive customs dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 13:53:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 967 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293518</link>
      <description>An early hearing application in a customs matter was allowed because the goods were a live consignment, warranting expedited disposal of the pending appeal. The application was granted after the other side raised no objection, and the appeal was accordingly listed for hearing on the specified date. The order is procedural and does not decide the substantive customs dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>