<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 566 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404074</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding that the Assessing Officer had valid reasons to believe income had escaped assessment due to undisclosed land purchases. The reassessment proceedings were deemed not barred by limitation as the undisclosed income exceeded the threshold for an extended limitation period. The petitioner&#039;s failure to fully disclose material facts justified the reassessment, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2021 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 566 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404074</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of the notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, finding that the Assessing Officer had valid reasons to believe income had escaped assessment due to undisclosed land purchases. The reassessment proceedings were deemed not barred by limitation as the undisclosed income exceeded the threshold for an extended limitation period. The petitioner&#039;s failure to fully disclose material facts justified the reassessment, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>