<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1411 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293508</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the findings of the CIT(A) and ITAT regarding the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions as factual, concluding that no substantial question of law arose. The appeal against the ITAT order deleting the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07 was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2021 21:49:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1411 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293508</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the findings of the CIT(A) and ITAT regarding the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions as factual, concluding that no substantial question of law arose. The appeal against the ITAT order deleting the addition under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2006-07 was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>