<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 559 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404067</link>
    <description>The High Court granted the petitioners anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C., subject to exceptions. The court directed the respondent to file a reply within four weeks and ordered no coercive steps against the petitioners until the next hearing. Emphasizing cooperation in the investigation, the judgment specified the exemption applied only to the petitioners and not as a precedent for future cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 13:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 559 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404067</link>
      <description>The High Court granted the petitioners anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C., subject to exceptions. The court directed the respondent to file a reply within four weeks and ordered no coercive steps against the petitioners until the next hearing. Emphasizing cooperation in the investigation, the judgment specified the exemption applied only to the petitioners and not as a precedent for future cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>