<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 555 - PATIALA HOUSE COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404063</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was declined in a GST prosecution involving alleged fake input tax credit, paper invoices, bogus transportation and a suspected chain of shell firms. The Court treated the allegations as a serious economic offence causing grave loss to the exchequer and found that the applicants&#039; asserted limited role did not outweigh the material then on record. It also held that pending adjudication proceedings were not a prerequisite for action on the alleged offence, and that partial deposit of the alleged liability did not justify pre-arrest protection. The application was rejected against both applicants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 555 - PATIALA HOUSE COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404063</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was declined in a GST prosecution involving alleged fake input tax credit, paper invoices, bogus transportation and a suspected chain of shell firms. The Court treated the allegations as a serious economic offence causing grave loss to the exchequer and found that the applicants&#039; asserted limited role did not outweigh the material then on record. It also held that pending adjudication proceedings were not a prerequisite for action on the alleged offence, and that partial deposit of the alleged liability did not justify pre-arrest protection. The application was rejected against both applicants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>