<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 531 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404039</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings under sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act due to insufficient grounds to believe income had escaped assessment. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, dismissing additions under sections 68 and 69C, and upheld the exemption claimed under section 10(38) for Long-Term Capital Gain. The Tribunal stressed the necessity of concrete evidence in tax assessments rather than mere suspicion or conjecture.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2021 21:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 531 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404039</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the reassessment proceedings under sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act due to insufficient grounds to believe income had escaped assessment. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, dismissing additions under sections 68 and 69C, and upheld the exemption claimed under section 10(38) for Long-Term Capital Gain. The Tribunal stressed the necessity of concrete evidence in tax assessments rather than mere suspicion or conjecture.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>