<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 528 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404036</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2007-08, holding that the exemption under Section 11 should be denied only to the extent of Rs. 13.36 lakhs. The Tribunal also directed the deletion of ad-hoc disallowances and the addition of refundable security deposits, while upholding the disallowance of donations. Appeals for subsequent years were decided based on similar findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2021 18:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 528 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404036</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2007-08, holding that the exemption under Section 11 should be denied only to the extent of Rs. 13.36 lakhs. The Tribunal also directed the deletion of ad-hoc disallowances and the addition of refundable security deposits, while upholding the disallowance of donations. Appeals for subsequent years were decided based on similar findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>