https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404032 The court dismissed the writ petition, finding the petitioner responsible for the loss of seized goods and emphasizing the need for pursuing a civil suit for compensation instead of seeking relief through a writ petition. The court highlighted the importance of timely action and proper legal procedures, noting that the claim was time-barred and that the petitioner had suppressed facts about the missing goods during the appeal process. en-us Tue, 09 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Feb 2021 17:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404032 The court dismissed the writ petition, finding the petitioner responsible for the loss of seized goods and emphasizing the need for pursuing a civil suit for compensation instead of seeking relief through a writ petition. The court highlighted the importance of timely action and proper legal procedures, noting that the claim was time-barred and that the petitioner had suppressed facts about the missing goods during the appeal process. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 09 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404032