https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404017 Section 91 CrPC could not be used to compel production of documents already marked as exhibits and forming part of the trial court record. The accused had sought the same board resolution, invoices and challans that were already on record, and the defence had already cross-examined the witness. In those circumstances, a fresh summons was unnecessary, especially because the relevance of re-production was not properly explained. The challenge to rejection of the application therefore failed, and the request was treated as not maintainable on the facts. en-us Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 13 Feb 2021 15:01:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404017 Section 91 CrPC could not be used to compel production of documents already marked as exhibits and forming part of the trial court record. The accused had sought the same board resolution, invoices and challans that were already on record, and the defence had already cross-examined the witness. In those circumstances, a fresh summons was unnecessary, especially because the relevance of re-production was not properly explained. The challenge to rejection of the application therefore failed, and the request was treated as not maintainable on the facts. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=404017