<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Employee’s welfare funds- S.43B not to apply to employees contributions- drafting of proposed amendment need to be modified.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9682</link>
    <description>The proposed Explanation would exclude employee-derived sums for welfare funds from the deduction-timing rule by stating the rule &quot;shall not apply and shall be deemed never to have been applied,&quot; creating retroactive ambiguity; the author urges deletion of that phrase, prospective application from the next accounting year, and clarification that employee contributions paid before return due dates remain deductible under the proviso, while noting definitional uncertainty whether payroll deductions are &quot;sums received from employees&quot; and warning of litigation and constitutional challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:59:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:59:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Employee’s welfare funds- S.43B not to apply to employees contributions- drafting of proposed amendment need to be modified.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9682</link>
      <description>The proposed Explanation would exclude employee-derived sums for welfare funds from the deduction-timing rule by stating the rule &quot;shall not apply and shall be deemed never to have been applied,&quot; creating retroactive ambiguity; the author urges deletion of that phrase, prospective application from the next accounting year, and clarification that employee contributions paid before return due dates remain deductible under the proviso, while noting definitional uncertainty whether payroll deductions are &quot;sums received from employees&quot; and warning of litigation and constitutional challenge.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2021 14:59:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>