<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (5) TMI 17 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24628</link>
    <description>Tax liability determined pursuant to a settlement was treated as deductible under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 while computing net wealth, even though it did not arise directly from the Income-tax Act or the Wealth-tax Act. The High Court applied an earlier binding decision that recognised such settlement-based tax liability as an allowable deduction under section 2(m). On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s approach was found consistent with the settled legal position and was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:16:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (5) TMI 17 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24628</link>
      <description>Tax liability determined pursuant to a settlement was treated as deductible under section 2(m) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 while computing net wealth, even though it did not arise directly from the Income-tax Act or the Wealth-tax Act. The High Court applied an earlier binding decision that recognised such settlement-based tax liability as an allowable deduction under section 2(m). On that basis, the Tribunal&#039;s approach was found consistent with the settled legal position and was upheld in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>