https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293496 Conviction for rape and allied offences cannot stand where the prosecutrix's account contains material contradictions and embellishments, is not consistently supported by other witnesses, and is not conclusively corroborated by medical or forensic evidence. The Court found that the sexual act was not proved to be non-consensual beyond reasonable doubt, so the conviction under section 376(2)(g) IPC was set aside. The charges of wrongful confinement, house trespass and criminal intimidation also failed because the prosecution did not reliably prove obstruction, unlawful entry with intent to cause hurt, or a legally sufficient threat. The appellants were acquitted of all charges. en-us Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Feb 2021 23:12:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293496 Conviction for rape and allied offences cannot stand where the prosecutrix's account contains material contradictions and embellishments, is not consistently supported by other witnesses, and is not conclusively corroborated by medical or forensic evidence. The Court found that the sexual act was not proved to be non-consensual beyond reasonable doubt, so the conviction under section 376(2)(g) IPC was set aside. The charges of wrongful confinement, house trespass and criminal intimidation also failed because the prosecution did not reliably prove obstruction, unlawful entry with intent to cause hurt, or a legally sufficient threat. The appellants were acquitted of all charges. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293496