<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1401 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293499</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the Show Cause Notice dated 17.05.2007 due to significant delay in adjudication and failure to comply with procedural requirements for extending the adjudication period. The judgment was influenced by previous rulings, including GPI Textile Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Harkaran Dass Vedpal Vs. Union of India, highlighting the importance of timely adjudication and procedural adherence in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 18:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1401 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293499</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the Show Cause Notice dated 17.05.2007 due to significant delay in adjudication and failure to comply with procedural requirements for extending the adjudication period. The judgment was influenced by previous rulings, including GPI Textile Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Harkaran Dass Vedpal Vs. Union of India, highlighting the importance of timely adjudication and procedural adherence in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>