<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (5) TMI 4 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24621</link>
    <description>A question can be directed for reference only if it actually arises from the Tribunal&#039;s order; issues based on factual contentions not urged before the Tribunal are outside that jurisdiction. The text also states that a finding that a person owned contraband goods or was concerned in acquiring, keeping, concealing, or dealing with them, when reached on appreciation of evidence, is a finding of fact. Mere disagreement with evidentiary appraisal does not convert such a finding into a referable question of law. On that basis, proposed reference questions were treated as non-referable, either because they did not arise from the record or because they attacked factual findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:44:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=63619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (5) TMI 4 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24621</link>
      <description>A question can be directed for reference only if it actually arises from the Tribunal&#039;s order; issues based on factual contentions not urged before the Tribunal are outside that jurisdiction. The text also states that a finding that a person owned contraband goods or was concerned in acquiring, keeping, concealing, or dealing with them, when reached on appreciation of evidence, is a finding of fact. Mere disagreement with evidentiary appraisal does not convert such a finding into a referable question of law. On that basis, proposed reference questions were treated as non-referable, either because they did not arise from the record or because they attacked factual findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=24621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>