https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403993 Concurrent findings on agreed rent and service of termination notice were upheld because they were supported by rent receipts, oral evidence, photographs, an independent electricity arrangement, pleadings, and postal tracking material. The revisional court reiterated that interference in small causes revision is confined to findings that are illegal, perverse, based on no evidence, or vitiated by misreading or non-consideration of material evidence; none of those grounds existed here. A plea that notice was sent to the wrong address, not raised in the pleadings, was rejected. The review/recall application therefore failed. en-us Fri, 08 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Feb 2021 20:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403993 Concurrent findings on agreed rent and service of termination notice were upheld because they were supported by rent receipts, oral evidence, photographs, an independent electricity arrangement, pleadings, and postal tracking material. The revisional court reiterated that interference in small causes revision is confined to findings that are illegal, perverse, based on no evidence, or vitiated by misreading or non-consideration of material evidence; none of those grounds existed here. A plea that notice was sent to the wrong address, not raised in the pleadings, was rejected. The review/recall application therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403993