<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 476 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403984</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the revision petition challenging the Rajasthan Tax Board&#039;s decision on entry tax liability. The petitioner argued the respondent was not a casual trader, but the court referenced a prior judgment supporting the Board&#039;s classification. The assessment was beyond the limitation period, and the Board&#039;s decision was upheld, finding no miscarriage of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2024 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 476 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403984</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the revision petition challenging the Rajasthan Tax Board&#039;s decision on entry tax liability. The petitioner argued the respondent was not a casual trader, but the court referenced a prior judgment supporting the Board&#039;s classification. The assessment was beyond the limitation period, and the Board&#039;s decision was upheld, finding no miscarriage of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>