<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 474 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403982</link>
    <description>The appeal arising from the dismissal of an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was upheld by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the application was not maintainable due to the withdrawal of a similar application without liberty to file a fresh one. Despite the Appellant&#039;s claim of a fresh cause of action arising from subsequent notices, the Tribunal ruled that the new application did not present any new grounds warranting a different outcome. The Tribunal emphasized the existence of pre-existing disputes between the parties and rejected the application&#039;s admissibility based on the ledger account and past notices. The appeal was dismissed, granting the Appellant liberty to seek alternative remedies in other forums if permissible by law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2021 12:02:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 474 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403982</link>
      <description>The appeal arising from the dismissal of an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was upheld by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the application was not maintainable due to the withdrawal of a similar application without liberty to file a fresh one. Despite the Appellant&#039;s claim of a fresh cause of action arising from subsequent notices, the Tribunal ruled that the new application did not present any new grounds warranting a different outcome. The Tribunal emphasized the existence of pre-existing disputes between the parties and rejected the application&#039;s admissibility based on the ledger account and past notices. The appeal was dismissed, granting the Appellant liberty to seek alternative remedies in other forums if permissible by law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>