<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (2) TMI 440 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403948</link>
    <description>NCLT held that a proprietary concern qualifies as a &quot;person&quot; under Section 3(23) of the IBC and an operational creditor for purposes of Section 9. Relying on NCLAT precedent, the Tribunal found the petitioner&#039;s operational debt and default established, declared the Section 9 application maintainable, admitted the CIRP against the corporate debtor and imposed the moratorium. The petition by the sole proprietorship was thus allowed and insolvency proceedings were initiated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 21:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (2) TMI 440 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403948</link>
      <description>NCLT held that a proprietary concern qualifies as a &quot;person&quot; under Section 3(23) of the IBC and an operational creditor for purposes of Section 9. Relying on NCLAT precedent, the Tribunal found the petitioner&#039;s operational debt and default established, declared the Section 9 application maintainable, admitted the CIRP against the corporate debtor and imposed the moratorium. The petition by the sole proprietorship was thus allowed and insolvency proceedings were initiated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=403948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>