https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293488 The court dismissed the writ petitions, declaring them without merit, and upheld the constitutional validity of Section 154 of the Finance Act, 2003. It ruled that the lack of a show cause notice did not violate natural justice due to binding precedent. The interest calculation method was deemed reasonable, and the demand notices were validated. Petitioners were ordered to pay costs of Rs. 50,000 each to the State Legal Services Authority, with the court criticizing the use of litigation to delay compliance with lawful demands. en-us Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293488 The court dismissed the writ petitions, declaring them without merit, and upheld the constitutional validity of Section 154 of the Finance Act, 2003. It ruled that the lack of a show cause notice did not violate natural justice due to binding precedent. The interest calculation method was deemed reasonable, and the demand notices were validated. Petitioners were ordered to pay costs of Rs. 50,000 each to the State Legal Services Authority, with the court criticizing the use of litigation to delay compliance with lawful demands. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 01 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293488