<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1601 - ITAT TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293452</link>
    <description>The ITAT Tribunal allowed the appeal of Shri Pankaj Shah &amp;amp; Shri Manoj Gupta against the order of the CIT(A)-II, Indore. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the case was restored to the file of the CIT(A) for providing a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 20:27:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636123" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1601 - ITAT TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293452</link>
      <description>The ITAT Tribunal allowed the appeal of Shri Pankaj Shah &amp;amp; Shri Manoj Gupta against the order of the CIT(A)-II, Indore. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the case was restored to the file of the CIT(A) for providing a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>