<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1396 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293470</link>
    <description>Allahabad was held to be the principal seat of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, though not a permanent seat, under the Amalgamation Order. A winding up reference relating to a company whose registered office fell within the Lucknow Bench territory could not validly be entertained and decided at Allahabad; such an order was treated as a nullity for want of jurisdiction. The objection was not barred by the appellant&#039;s long participation because a defect going to subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be cured by delay or acquiescence. The impugned winding up order was set aside and the matter directed to the competent Company Judge at Lucknow for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 20:27:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1396 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293470</link>
      <description>Allahabad was held to be the principal seat of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, though not a permanent seat, under the Amalgamation Order. A winding up reference relating to a company whose registered office fell within the Lucknow Bench territory could not validly be entertained and decided at Allahabad; such an order was treated as a nullity for want of jurisdiction. The objection was not barred by the appellant&#039;s long participation because a defect going to subject-matter jurisdiction cannot be cured by delay or acquiescence. The impugned winding up order was set aside and the matter directed to the competent Company Judge at Lucknow for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>