https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293466 Title to immovable property cannot be displaced on the basis of an alleged oral relinquishment or a mutation entry where no pleaded case was made and no registered relinquishment deed was proved. The High Court held that instruments creating or extinguishing rights in immovable property, where registration is compulsory, must be duly registered; an unregistered document cannot affect the property or be relied on as proof of such transfer. Because the defendants failed to establish any lawful registered transfer or pre-existing title, the first appellate court erred in accepting their half-share claim and the trial court's decree in favour of the plaintiff was restored. en-us Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Feb 2021 20:27:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293466 Title to immovable property cannot be displaced on the basis of an alleged oral relinquishment or a mutation entry where no pleaded case was made and no registered relinquishment deed was proved. The High Court held that instruments creating or extinguishing rights in immovable property, where registration is compulsory, must be duly registered; an unregistered document cannot affect the property or be relied on as proof of such transfer. Because the defendants failed to establish any lawful registered transfer or pre-existing title, the first appellate court erred in accepting their half-share claim and the trial court's decree in favour of the plaintiff was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293466