<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1381 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293464</link>
    <description>The statutory scheme under Section 19(17) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 read with Rule 10(b) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007 permits adjustment of excess payment against arrears for earlier assessment years. On the stated analysis, a notice reversing such adjustment was treated as contrary to that scheme and without legal basis. The document records that the impugned order was quashed and the writ petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 20:27:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1381 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293464</link>
      <description>The statutory scheme under Section 19(17) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 read with Rule 10(b) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007 permits adjustment of excess payment against arrears for earlier assessment years. On the stated analysis, a notice reversing such adjustment was treated as contrary to that scheme and without legal basis. The document records that the impugned order was quashed and the writ petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>