https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293461 The Tribunal ultimately decided to condone the delay of 3666 days in filing the appeal, despite acknowledging the negligence of the appellant and their advocate. Emphasizing the principles of substantial justice and the potential injustice of dismissing the appeal, the Tribunal imposed a cost of &8377;30,000 on the appellant. This decision aimed to address the negligence while ensuring the appellant's case could be heard on its merits, avoiding irreparable loss and hardship. en-us Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Feb 2021 20:27:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293461 The Tribunal ultimately decided to condone the delay of 3666 days in filing the appeal, despite acknowledging the negligence of the appellant and their advocate. Emphasizing the principles of substantial justice and the potential injustice of dismissing the appeal, the Tribunal imposed a cost of &8377;30,000 on the appellant. This decision aimed to address the negligence while ensuring the appellant's case could be heard on its merits, avoiding irreparable loss and hardship. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293461