<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1399 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293478</link>
    <description>An advance ruling application by a non-resident was held not maintainable because the receipts arose from agreements executed by an affiliate, while the applicant was not the real recipient of the income or the party to the transaction on its own account. The arrangement was treated as application of income rather than transfer of the source of income, and the record indicated that contractual obligations remained with the affiliate. The AAR also found the structure prima facie lacked commercial substance and was designed around tax avoidance features, so the statutory bar against rulings in such cases applied. The application was rejected without examining the merits of the taxability claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 15:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=636101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1399 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293478</link>
      <description>An advance ruling application by a non-resident was held not maintainable because the receipts arose from agreements executed by an affiliate, while the applicant was not the real recipient of the income or the party to the transaction on its own account. The arrangement was treated as application of income rather than transfer of the source of income, and the record indicated that contractual obligations remained with the affiliate. The AAR also found the structure prima facie lacked commercial substance and was designed around tax avoidance features, so the statutory bar against rulings in such cases applied. The application was rejected without examining the merits of the taxability claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>