https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293474 In second appeal, factual findings of the first appellate court cannot be reappreciated unless a genuine substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC. The High Court erred in treating documentary appreciation and ownership findings as a legal issue and in disturbing title based on registered sale deeds. Mutation and jamabandi entries do not create or extinguish title, and a person who entered possession as a lessee or permissive holder must prove hostile, continuous possession to establish adverse possession. On the facts, the respondent failed to prove such hostile possession, so ownership could not be claimed on that basis and the appellants' title was upheld. en-us Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Feb 2021 20:27:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293474 In second appeal, factual findings of the first appellate court cannot be reappreciated unless a genuine substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC. The High Court erred in treating documentary appreciation and ownership findings as a legal issue and in disturbing title based on registered sale deeds. Mutation and jamabandi entries do not create or extinguish title, and a person who entered possession as a lessee or permissive holder must prove hostile, continuous possession to establish adverse possession. On the facts, the respondent failed to prove such hostile possession, so ownership could not be claimed on that basis and the appellants' title was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293474