https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293444 Ornaments entrusted for use in a Ram Lila procession were treated as a loan and bailment, not a deposit. Article 145 of the Limitation Act did not apply because the claim was not for recovery of moveable property deposited or pawned, and Article 49 also did not apply because the property was not wrongfully taken, injured or detained; it had been stolen from the defendant's possession. The bailee was subject to an implied contract to return the goods when the purpose ended, or within a reasonable time thereafter. As no specific article governed the claim, Article 115 applied to the suit for breach of implied contract, with the result that the action was barred by limitation. en-us Tue, 15 Apr 1930 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:11:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293444 Ornaments entrusted for use in a Ram Lila procession were treated as a loan and bailment, not a deposit. Article 145 of the Limitation Act did not apply because the claim was not for recovery of moveable property deposited or pawned, and Article 49 also did not apply because the property was not wrongfully taken, injured or detained; it had been stolen from the defendant's possession. The bailee was subject to an implied contract to return the goods when the purpose ended, or within a reasonable time thereafter. As no specific article governed the claim, Article 115 applied to the suit for breach of implied contract, with the result that the action was barred by limitation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Apr 1930 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293444